Narnia lovers behold this book. Michael Ward’s revelatory work is too edifying to ignore. For half a century we read (or had read to us) C.S. Lewis’s magnificent Chronicles of Narnia. We love them because they captivate us. 

The series has a mystery, however. Disparateness clouds the atmosphere; a lack of thorough artistry found in Lewis’s other fiction. Lewis’s mind is consistently meticulous and lucid, a chief trait of the medieval authors he taught professionally, and therein lies the secret. 

More than allegory, yet nothing obviously more, Planet Narnia contends that Lewis made it so intentionally. Ward argues that each chronicle corresponds to one of the seven planets of medieval astrology. As a whole, they (the chronicles infused with the characteristic traits of the planets) create an atmosphere that is both honest to the human experience and consistent with the loveliness and sovereignty of Christ the Lord. The subtlety, an atmospheric quality, is consistent with Lewis’s pneumatology, which maintains that unawareness of the Holy Spirit is a common condition in our human experience. Ward’s case focuses on the peculiarities in The Chronicles, of which there are many, like the supposedly discordant appearance of St. Nicholas in The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe. Suddenly they make sense – the jovial saint’s laughter resonates like guilt forgiven. 

Many critics mistook Lewis for slopping together a menagerie of characters and plots without a guiding principle, argues Ward. Rather, it seems that a combination of an allegorical element teetering the brink of believability and dissatisfaction, a well-known pejorative judgment by J.R.R. Tolkien, and Lewis’s deliberate imaginative subtlety kept readers orbiting the astrological inner meaning without fully understanding that which pulled them. 

Planet Narnia is and claims to be a scholarly work. It is formidable, but as a reader I was pleasantly surprised by how cogently the argument runs. The Chronicles of Narnia are, after all, no Ulysses or Shakespearean play: the story is easy and the prose style is perfectly clear for everyone to enjoy. A work of literary criticism on such a matter-of-fact story lives or dies by its success in drawing out the facts or else garbling the matter. Ward excels in the former. Furthermore, Ward has not fluffed a Procrustean bed. Every proper literary question such as those of occasion, composition, and reception is considered thoughtfully and convincingly. Narnia is not scathed like the Planet Narnia cynics I know feared. Planet Narnia opens our eyes to something we already sensed: the kingly robes that the series has worn all along. 

Ward does not argue that The Chronicles of Narnia fail at spiritual edification unless you accept his conclusion. He affirms that Narnia animates our moral imaginations with the glories of landscape, adventure, and righteousness whether or not readers recognize what (or Who!) is acting on them. Planet Narnia is merely a vestibule between the shade of a purblind enjoyment and spiritual convalescence – a sort of enjoyment that draws you further in and higher up. Narnia is a spiritual place that ought to be discerned spiritually. Lewis might add: heavenly, for the heavens do the declaring.

2 Responses to “Planet Narnia; The Seven Heavens in the Imagination of C.S. Lewis”

  1. Enneas said

    And what´s your opinion about the film version of Narnia?

  2. daveytalbot said

    Well, I enjoyed the first film, and I suspect I will enjoy the second when I get around to seeing it. I can’t remember the name of the producer, but I have heard about him back at Hillsdale and from Michael Ward. It seems that the films are made with due respect and care. I appreciate that.

    May I turn your question back on you? What do you think of the films?

Leave a Reply